22.08.2006
Opinion : Sought by Mr.Somasundaram residing at Dindugal regarding payment of maintenance in divorce case through “udavikaram” magazine August 2006 issue
Query : 1. Should a disabled person having only passed +2 and D.Co.Op pay maintenance to the wife with B.A.qualification
2. Whether there is any provision in the Persons With Disabilities… Act in this regard. If not can an amendment in this regard be made in the Act?
Facts underlying the query:
1. The Queriest submits that he suffers paralysis in his right hand due to an accident and he is therefore a disabled person having first passed +2 and D.Co.Op. He is employed in a Co-operative society for a meager wages.
2. He further states that he was married on 04.12.2003 at the age of 37 and the marriage lasted only for about seven months. The matrimonial dispute is pending before the Dindugal Court. It appears that his wife has claimed maintenance from him and he wants to know whether maintenance can be avoided on the ground of his disability.
3. It is first necessary to understand the purpose of the Persons With Disabilities Act. The act has been brought into force to ensure integration of the persons with disability with the mainstream society through various measures both right oriented and welfare oriented. The Persons With Disabilities Act has nothing to do with this and no amendments can be suggested in this regard
4. As per law maintenance of wife, children, aged parents and other dependent kind is a bounden duty of every man in our country. Neglect of this duty is punishable under law. No one can use his or her disability to shed his duty.
5. The querist has to pay the maintenance as ordered by the Court. However, it is for the Court to decide the quantum of maintenance after taking various factors into consideration and hence he can put forth his case before the Court.
Saturday, December 1, 2007
Saturday, October 20, 2007
ESCAP
The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) is the regional development arm of the United Nations for the Asia-Pacific region. With a membership of 62 Governments, 58 of which are in the region, and a geographical scope that stretches from Turkey in the west to the Pacific island nation of Kiribati in the east, and from the Russian Federation in the north to New Zealand in the south, ESCAP is the most comprehensive of the United Nations five regional commissions. It is also the largest United Nations body serving the Asia-Pacific region with over 600 staff.
Agenda for Action for the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002,
INTRODUCTION
The United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons, 1983-1992, coincided with a period of economic dynamism throughout much of the Asian and Pacific region. The concluding years of the United Nations Decade also witnessed major breakthroughs in peace-building in the region marked by significant improvements in conflict resolution and rapprochement between diverse states.
It was in this hospitable context that the Social Development Strategy for the ESCAP Region Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond was adopted by the Fourth Asian and Pacific Ministerial Conference on Social Welfare and Social Development, held at Manila in October 1991. The Strategy has the ultimate aim of improving the quality of life of all the people of the ESCAP region. With that aim in mind, the basic objectives of the Strategy are the eradication of absolute poverty, the realization of distributive justice and the enhancement of popular participation. Within the framework of those aims and objectives, the Strategy assigns priority to the region's disadvantaged and vulnerable social groups, including persons with disabilities.
Further to the priority given to the concerns of persons with disabilities in the regional Social Development Strategy, thirty-three countries attending the forty-eighth ESCAP session in April 1992 joined in sponsorship of resolution 48/3 on an Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002. In adopting the resolution, the Governments of the region expressed their collective commitment to the full participation and equality of people with disabilities.
The Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons provides an opportunity for the 56 countries and areas of the ESCAP region to consolidate the efforts initiated during the preceding United Nations Decade through a new emphasis on regional cooperation in support of progress at the national level. In particular, it provides a context for the strengthening of technical cooperation among developing countries, as well as between the region's developing and developed countries, in the resolution of key issues that affect the lives of people with disabilities.
To achieve the objectives of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, an agenda for action is needed that translates the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons into an agenda for the Asian and Pacific region, in response to the review and appraisal of the achievements of the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons, 1983-1992, in the Asian and Pacific region as contained in document SD/DDP/1, 1992.
The present document provides a framework for the formulation of that agenda for action. The framework consists of the major policy categories under which efforts will be required for the implementation of ESCAP resolution 48/3. These basic policy categories include:
• National coordination;
• Legislation;
• Information;
• Public awareness;
• Accessibility and communication;
• Education;
• Training and employment;
• Prevention of causes of disabilities;
• Rehabilitation services;
• Assistive devices;
• Self-help organizations;
• Regional cooperation;
Each of the policy categories constituting the framework contains a list of areas of concern of direct relevance to the development of policies in support of the full participation and equality of people with disabilities in Asia and the Pacific.
The formulation of an agenda for action for the Decade should be neither an exercise in regional target setting nor an attempt to prescribe a uniform implementation strategy for all countries. Given the vastness and diversity of the region, ESCAP members and associate members will necessarily differ on the details of their respective national action programmes. There will be differences in the relative priority to be assigned to particular activities. Specific short- and long-term objectives, as well as approaches to and the pace of implementation will also vary from country to country. In the final analysis, however, the agenda for action will provide the basis for a regional initiative aimed at realizing the full participation and equality of persons with disabilities, which comprise the objectives of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002.
Furthermore, the agenda for action is to be viewed in the context of the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and other relevant United Nations international instruments, mandates and recommendations.
AREAS OF CONCERN
National coordination
a. Establishment of a national coordination committee on disability matters or strengthening of an existing one:
b. As a permanent body with adequate infrastructural support;
c. With representation from concerned government agencies, and non-governmental organizations, including adequate representation from organizations of people with disabilities;
To serve as the national focal point on disability matters and facilitate the continuous evolution of a comprehensive national approach to the implementation of the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and this agenda for action by undertaking the following:
Review and coordinate the activities of all agencies and non-governmental organizations working for and on behalf of people with disabilities;
Develop a national policy to address issues faced by people with disabilities;
Advise the Head of State/Government, policy makers and programme planners on the development of policies, legislation, programmes and projects with respect to their impact on people with disabilities;
Render guidance services to ministries in the enforcement of legislation to protect the rights of people with disabilities, and in the elimination of interpretations that are unfavourable to people with disabilities;
Mobilize support for the development of a national data base on disability-related issues;
Translate the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and this agenda for action into the national (and local) languages and in appropriate formats for widespread dissemination at all levels;
Operate a scheme to upgrade the competence of staff of the national coordination committee, particularly on management skills, policy and programme development, and to include persons with disabilities in staff recruitment and training;
Promote resource mobilization for dealing with disability issues, including through the creation of adequate funds with donations from industry, philanthropists and other donors;
Promote the integration of people with disabilities, including children and women with disabilities, in national plans and in programmes and projects supported by i nternational agencies, including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF);
Review with donor agencies their funding policies from the perspective of their impact on persons with disabilities;
Monitor and evaluate the impact of policies and programmes on the full participation and equality of persons with disabilities, and disseminate the results to concerned parties;
Facilitate national participation in regional cooperation activities related to the implementation of Commission resolution 48/3;
Establish schemes to accord public recognition of outstanding contributions to progress in pursuance of the goals of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons;
Encourage the use of the relevant United Nations guidelines for the establishment and development of national coordinating committees on disability or similar bodies.
Legislation
a. Concerning existing legislation:
Conduct of a survey to identify legal provisions that are restrictive to people with disabilities;
Amendment or repeal of those restrictive legal provisions and elimination of interpretations that are unfavourable to people with disabilities;
b. Enactment of a basic law on protection of the rights of all persons with disabilities and prohibition of abuse and neglect of these persons and discrimination against them;
c. Enactment of legislation aimed at equal opportunity for people with disabilities, covering, for example:
Affirmative action measures and incentives in favour of opportunities for people with disabilities to participate in education, training, job placement, employment and entrepreneurship;
Tax relief and subsidies, as appropriate, for parents and guardians of children with disabilities, as well as for people with disabilities;
Customs clearance and exemption from customs duty of imported vehicles, assistive devices, equipment and materials, including medical supplies, required to facilitate the daily life of people with disabilities;
d. Enactment of legislation aimed at the elimination of architectural and logistical barriers to freedom of movement of citizens with disabilities, including incentives to encourage:
Private and public sector involvement in improving accessibility of the built environment;
Facilitation of use, by persons with disabilities, of land, air and water transport systems;
e. Enactment of legislation aimed at the elimination of communication barriers to reduce the social and physical isolation commonly faced by people with disabilities, covering, for example:
Production and dissemination of information, especially public information, in appropriate formats (e.g., large print, Braille, indigenous sign language, audio/video cassette and floppy diskette);
Facilitation of, and concessions and subsidies for, the use of postal and telecommunications equipment and services by people with disabilities;
f. Inclusion of the concerns of persons with disabilities in social security legislation;
g. Enactment of legislation for the promotion of health and safety in the work-place, in public places, and in the home, e.g.:
• Prohibition on smoking as a public health hazard;
• Restrictions on the sale of firearms and fireworks;
• Restrictions on alcohol consumption and driving;
• Control over the roadworthiness of vehicles;
• Standards for the safety of equipment, items for industrial, domestic and personal use, as well as toys and other items that children may have access to;
h. Development of means of ensuring the effective implementation and enforcement of legislation, including:
• Regulations on and guidelines for implementation;
• Mechanisms to promote enforcement (e.g., community-level committees, ombudspersons, enforcement tribunals);
• Mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the enforcement of legislation;
i. Enactment of legislation regarding persons with extensive disabilities, of all ages, that assigns priority to the provision of community-based personal assistance services for daily living, to enable them to live in the community with self-determination and dignity, rather than in residential institutions;
j. Dissemination of information on legislation, particularly to people with disabilities and their advocates
• Enacted specifically to promote equal opportunities for people with disabilities;
• Enacted for the benefit of broader population groups (e.g., legislation on an issue [poverty alleviation] or for a specific group [women]) among whom many people with disabilities are included;
k. Encouragement of the use of relevant United Nations guidelines on national disability legislation;
l. Encouragement of exchange of expertise and experiences among ESCAP members and associate members concerning the enactment and implementation of equalization legislation.
Agenda for Action for the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002,
INTRODUCTION
The United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons, 1983-1992, coincided with a period of economic dynamism throughout much of the Asian and Pacific region. The concluding years of the United Nations Decade also witnessed major breakthroughs in peace-building in the region marked by significant improvements in conflict resolution and rapprochement between diverse states.
It was in this hospitable context that the Social Development Strategy for the ESCAP Region Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond was adopted by the Fourth Asian and Pacific Ministerial Conference on Social Welfare and Social Development, held at Manila in October 1991. The Strategy has the ultimate aim of improving the quality of life of all the people of the ESCAP region. With that aim in mind, the basic objectives of the Strategy are the eradication of absolute poverty, the realization of distributive justice and the enhancement of popular participation. Within the framework of those aims and objectives, the Strategy assigns priority to the region's disadvantaged and vulnerable social groups, including persons with disabilities.
Further to the priority given to the concerns of persons with disabilities in the regional Social Development Strategy, thirty-three countries attending the forty-eighth ESCAP session in April 1992 joined in sponsorship of resolution 48/3 on an Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002. In adopting the resolution, the Governments of the region expressed their collective commitment to the full participation and equality of people with disabilities.
The Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons provides an opportunity for the 56 countries and areas of the ESCAP region to consolidate the efforts initiated during the preceding United Nations Decade through a new emphasis on regional cooperation in support of progress at the national level. In particular, it provides a context for the strengthening of technical cooperation among developing countries, as well as between the region's developing and developed countries, in the resolution of key issues that affect the lives of people with disabilities.
To achieve the objectives of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, an agenda for action is needed that translates the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons into an agenda for the Asian and Pacific region, in response to the review and appraisal of the achievements of the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons, 1983-1992, in the Asian and Pacific region as contained in document SD/DDP/1, 1992.
The present document provides a framework for the formulation of that agenda for action. The framework consists of the major policy categories under which efforts will be required for the implementation of ESCAP resolution 48/3. These basic policy categories include:
• National coordination;
• Legislation;
• Information;
• Public awareness;
• Accessibility and communication;
• Education;
• Training and employment;
• Prevention of causes of disabilities;
• Rehabilitation services;
• Assistive devices;
• Self-help organizations;
• Regional cooperation;
Each of the policy categories constituting the framework contains a list of areas of concern of direct relevance to the development of policies in support of the full participation and equality of people with disabilities in Asia and the Pacific.
The formulation of an agenda for action for the Decade should be neither an exercise in regional target setting nor an attempt to prescribe a uniform implementation strategy for all countries. Given the vastness and diversity of the region, ESCAP members and associate members will necessarily differ on the details of their respective national action programmes. There will be differences in the relative priority to be assigned to particular activities. Specific short- and long-term objectives, as well as approaches to and the pace of implementation will also vary from country to country. In the final analysis, however, the agenda for action will provide the basis for a regional initiative aimed at realizing the full participation and equality of persons with disabilities, which comprise the objectives of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 1993-2002.
Furthermore, the agenda for action is to be viewed in the context of the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and other relevant United Nations international instruments, mandates and recommendations.
AREAS OF CONCERN
National coordination
a. Establishment of a national coordination committee on disability matters or strengthening of an existing one:
b. As a permanent body with adequate infrastructural support;
c. With representation from concerned government agencies, and non-governmental organizations, including adequate representation from organizations of people with disabilities;
To serve as the national focal point on disability matters and facilitate the continuous evolution of a comprehensive national approach to the implementation of the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and this agenda for action by undertaking the following:
Review and coordinate the activities of all agencies and non-governmental organizations working for and on behalf of people with disabilities;
Develop a national policy to address issues faced by people with disabilities;
Advise the Head of State/Government, policy makers and programme planners on the development of policies, legislation, programmes and projects with respect to their impact on people with disabilities;
Render guidance services to ministries in the enforcement of legislation to protect the rights of people with disabilities, and in the elimination of interpretations that are unfavourable to people with disabilities;
Mobilize support for the development of a national data base on disability-related issues;
Translate the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and this agenda for action into the national (and local) languages and in appropriate formats for widespread dissemination at all levels;
Operate a scheme to upgrade the competence of staff of the national coordination committee, particularly on management skills, policy and programme development, and to include persons with disabilities in staff recruitment and training;
Promote resource mobilization for dealing with disability issues, including through the creation of adequate funds with donations from industry, philanthropists and other donors;
Promote the integration of people with disabilities, including children and women with disabilities, in national plans and in programmes and projects supported by i nternational agencies, including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF);
Review with donor agencies their funding policies from the perspective of their impact on persons with disabilities;
Monitor and evaluate the impact of policies and programmes on the full participation and equality of persons with disabilities, and disseminate the results to concerned parties;
Facilitate national participation in regional cooperation activities related to the implementation of Commission resolution 48/3;
Establish schemes to accord public recognition of outstanding contributions to progress in pursuance of the goals of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons;
Encourage the use of the relevant United Nations guidelines for the establishment and development of national coordinating committees on disability or similar bodies.
Legislation
a. Concerning existing legislation:
Conduct of a survey to identify legal provisions that are restrictive to people with disabilities;
Amendment or repeal of those restrictive legal provisions and elimination of interpretations that are unfavourable to people with disabilities;
b. Enactment of a basic law on protection of the rights of all persons with disabilities and prohibition of abuse and neglect of these persons and discrimination against them;
c. Enactment of legislation aimed at equal opportunity for people with disabilities, covering, for example:
Affirmative action measures and incentives in favour of opportunities for people with disabilities to participate in education, training, job placement, employment and entrepreneurship;
Tax relief and subsidies, as appropriate, for parents and guardians of children with disabilities, as well as for people with disabilities;
Customs clearance and exemption from customs duty of imported vehicles, assistive devices, equipment and materials, including medical supplies, required to facilitate the daily life of people with disabilities;
d. Enactment of legislation aimed at the elimination of architectural and logistical barriers to freedom of movement of citizens with disabilities, including incentives to encourage:
Private and public sector involvement in improving accessibility of the built environment;
Facilitation of use, by persons with disabilities, of land, air and water transport systems;
e. Enactment of legislation aimed at the elimination of communication barriers to reduce the social and physical isolation commonly faced by people with disabilities, covering, for example:
Production and dissemination of information, especially public information, in appropriate formats (e.g., large print, Braille, indigenous sign language, audio/video cassette and floppy diskette);
Facilitation of, and concessions and subsidies for, the use of postal and telecommunications equipment and services by people with disabilities;
f. Inclusion of the concerns of persons with disabilities in social security legislation;
g. Enactment of legislation for the promotion of health and safety in the work-place, in public places, and in the home, e.g.:
• Prohibition on smoking as a public health hazard;
• Restrictions on the sale of firearms and fireworks;
• Restrictions on alcohol consumption and driving;
• Control over the roadworthiness of vehicles;
• Standards for the safety of equipment, items for industrial, domestic and personal use, as well as toys and other items that children may have access to;
h. Development of means of ensuring the effective implementation and enforcement of legislation, including:
• Regulations on and guidelines for implementation;
• Mechanisms to promote enforcement (e.g., community-level committees, ombudspersons, enforcement tribunals);
• Mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the enforcement of legislation;
i. Enactment of legislation regarding persons with extensive disabilities, of all ages, that assigns priority to the provision of community-based personal assistance services for daily living, to enable them to live in the community with self-determination and dignity, rather than in residential institutions;
j. Dissemination of information on legislation, particularly to people with disabilities and their advocates
• Enacted specifically to promote equal opportunities for people with disabilities;
• Enacted for the benefit of broader population groups (e.g., legislation on an issue [poverty alleviation] or for a specific group [women]) among whom many people with disabilities are included;
k. Encouragement of the use of relevant United Nations guidelines on national disability legislation;
l. Encouragement of exchange of expertise and experiences among ESCAP members and associate members concerning the enactment and implementation of equalization legislation.
Saturday, October 13, 2007
COURT FEES FOR CONSUMER COMPLAINTS as prevailant in Tamilnadu
District Forum
Upto 1,00,000/- Rs. 100/-
Above 1,00,000/- and below 5,00,000/- Rs. 200/-
Above 5,00,000/- and below 10,00,000/- Rs. 400/-
Above 10,00,000/- and below 20,00,000/- Rs. 500/-
D.D. or Postal Order, drawn in favour of - The President, District Consumer Disputes and Redressal Forum.
for BPL card holders no court fee up to 1lakh
_______________________________________________
State Commission
Above 20,00,000/- and below 50,00,000/- Rs. 2000/-
Above 50,00,000/- and below 1,00,00,000/- Rs. 4000/-
D.D. or Postal Order, drawn in favour of - The Registrar, State Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission.
_______________________________________________
National Commission
Above one crore Rs. 5000/-
D.D. or Postal Order, drawn in favour of - The Registrar, National Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission.
Upto 1,00,000/- Rs. 100/-
Above 1,00,000/- and below 5,00,000/- Rs. 200/-
Above 5,00,000/- and below 10,00,000/- Rs. 400/-
Above 10,00,000/- and below 20,00,000/- Rs. 500/-
D.D. or Postal Order, drawn in favour of - The President, District Consumer Disputes and Redressal Forum.
for BPL card holders no court fee up to 1lakh
_______________________________________________
State Commission
Above 20,00,000/- and below 50,00,000/- Rs. 2000/-
Above 50,00,000/- and below 1,00,00,000/- Rs. 4000/-
D.D. or Postal Order, drawn in favour of - The Registrar, State Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission.
_______________________________________________
National Commission
Above one crore Rs. 5000/-
D.D. or Postal Order, drawn in favour of - The Registrar, National Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission.
Sunday, October 7, 2007
First Intellectual Property protection in India
A punkah pulling machine
ON February 28, 1856, the Government of India promulgated legislation to grant what was then termed as "exclusive privileges for the encouragement of inventions of new manufactures". On March 3, 1856, a civil engineer, George Alfred DePenning of 7, Grant's Lane, Calcutta petitioned the Government of India for grant of exclusive privileges for his invention — "An Efficient Punkah Pulling Machine". On September 2 DePenning, submitted the Specifications for his invention along with drawings to illustrate its working. These were accepted and the invention was granted the first ever Intellectual Property protection in India. DePenning, submitted petitions for two more inventions that same year — No. 2 and No. 4 of 1856 under the Act and in the years to follow several patents were granted by the Calcutta Patent Office to this prodigious inventor. - this information was provided by Mr. Ashish in the orkut IP group
ON February 28, 1856, the Government of India promulgated legislation to grant what was then termed as "exclusive privileges for the encouragement of inventions of new manufactures". On March 3, 1856, a civil engineer, George Alfred DePenning of 7, Grant's Lane, Calcutta petitioned the Government of India for grant of exclusive privileges for his invention — "An Efficient Punkah Pulling Machine". On September 2 DePenning, submitted the Specifications for his invention along with drawings to illustrate its working. These were accepted and the invention was granted the first ever Intellectual Property protection in India. DePenning, submitted petitions for two more inventions that same year — No. 2 and No. 4 of 1856 under the Act and in the years to follow several patents were granted by the Calcutta Patent Office to this prodigious inventor. - this information was provided by Mr. Ashish in the orkut IP group
Sunday, July 22, 2007
consumer responsibility in civil aviation part 2
This undertaking only implies that the disabled people are treated by the airline operators as goods and not as human beings. The Directorate General of civil aviation, the body in charge of regulating air transport services has not come out with any rules or regulations in respect of safety and protection of rights of the persons with disability or reduced mobility. We therefore have to look into the rules and regulations of other nations.
In this line the first significant regulation is the Regulation (Ec) No 1107/2006 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 5 July 2006, Concerning the Rights of Disabled Persons and Persons with Reduced Mobility when traveling by air. This Regulation establishes rules for the protection of and provision of assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility travelling by air, both to protect them against discrimination and to ensure that they receive assistance. Art.1
This regulation takes in to account the very vocabulary that is used to describe persons with disability. It defines reduced mobility as disabled person’ or ‘person with reduced mobility’ means any person whose mobility when using transport is reduced due to any physical disability (sensory or locomotor, permanent or temporary), intellectual disability or impairment, or any other cause of disability, or age, and whose situation needs appropriate attention and the adaptation to his or her particular needs of the service made available to all passengers; Art. 2
In this definition the term disability is removed from the context of physical condition to the ability to move in the given built environment. It includes aged and the children within its ambit along with persons with certain physical conditions impairing their free mobility. It therefore uses the term person with reduced mobility.
It recognizes the Right of the persons with reduced mobility to reservation and embarking in flights. Art. 3
An air carrier or its agent or a tour operator shall not refuse, on the grounds of disability or of reduced mobility: (a) to accept a reservation for a flight departing from or arriving at an airport to which this Regulation applies;
(b) to embark a disabled person or a person with reduced mobility at such an airport, provided that the person concerned has a valid ticket and reservation.
In case of specific situations where the embarking cannot be made the regulation in art. 4 Provides as follows:
In the event of refusal to accept a reservation on the grounds referred to under points (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph, the air carrier, its agent or the tour operator shall make reasonable efforts to propose an acceptable alternative to the person in question. A disabled person or a person with reduced mobility who has been denied embarkation on the grounds of his or her disability or reduced mobility and any person accompanying this person pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article shall be offered the right to reimbursement or re-routing as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004. The right to the option of a return flight or re-routing shall be conditional upon all safety requirements being met.
The regulations mandates cumpolsory training for all the staffs even if they are employed by a third part contractor.
Art. 11 Air carriers and airport managing bodies shall:
(a) ensure that all their personnel, including those employed by any sub-contractor, providing direct assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility have knowledge of how to meet the needs of persons having various disabilities or mobility impairments;
(b) provide disability-equality and disability-awareness training to all their personnel working at the airport who deal directly with the travelling public;
(c) ensure that, upon recruitment, all new employees attend disability related training and that personnel receive refresher training courses when appropriate.
Article 12 provides for Compensation for lost or damaged wheelchairs, other mobility equipment and assistive devices whilst being handled at the airport or transported on board aircraft, in accordance with rules of international, Community and national law.
The regulations of the EU provides for filing complaints, appeals, redresses compensations for breach of regulations etc.
Access to Air Travel for Disabled People – Code of Practice ; united kingdom is the ratifying code which ratifies the EU Regulations. It emphasizes that the costs of providing assistance to disabled passengers at airports should not be passed directly to those disabled passengers and that it is cost effective to ensure that access for disabled people is included from the outset as part of the initial design of an aircraft and airport terminal and this directly benefits all customers. for its full text visit www.dft.gov.uk
In this line the first significant regulation is the Regulation (Ec) No 1107/2006 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 5 July 2006, Concerning the Rights of Disabled Persons and Persons with Reduced Mobility when traveling by air. This Regulation establishes rules for the protection of and provision of assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility travelling by air, both to protect them against discrimination and to ensure that they receive assistance. Art.1
This regulation takes in to account the very vocabulary that is used to describe persons with disability. It defines reduced mobility as disabled person’ or ‘person with reduced mobility’ means any person whose mobility when using transport is reduced due to any physical disability (sensory or locomotor, permanent or temporary), intellectual disability or impairment, or any other cause of disability, or age, and whose situation needs appropriate attention and the adaptation to his or her particular needs of the service made available to all passengers; Art. 2
In this definition the term disability is removed from the context of physical condition to the ability to move in the given built environment. It includes aged and the children within its ambit along with persons with certain physical conditions impairing their free mobility. It therefore uses the term person with reduced mobility.
It recognizes the Right of the persons with reduced mobility to reservation and embarking in flights. Art. 3
An air carrier or its agent or a tour operator shall not refuse, on the grounds of disability or of reduced mobility: (a) to accept a reservation for a flight departing from or arriving at an airport to which this Regulation applies;
(b) to embark a disabled person or a person with reduced mobility at such an airport, provided that the person concerned has a valid ticket and reservation.
In case of specific situations where the embarking cannot be made the regulation in art. 4 Provides as follows:
In the event of refusal to accept a reservation on the grounds referred to under points (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph, the air carrier, its agent or the tour operator shall make reasonable efforts to propose an acceptable alternative to the person in question. A disabled person or a person with reduced mobility who has been denied embarkation on the grounds of his or her disability or reduced mobility and any person accompanying this person pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article shall be offered the right to reimbursement or re-routing as provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004. The right to the option of a return flight or re-routing shall be conditional upon all safety requirements being met.
The regulations mandates cumpolsory training for all the staffs even if they are employed by a third part contractor.
Art. 11 Air carriers and airport managing bodies shall:
(a) ensure that all their personnel, including those employed by any sub-contractor, providing direct assistance to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility have knowledge of how to meet the needs of persons having various disabilities or mobility impairments;
(b) provide disability-equality and disability-awareness training to all their personnel working at the airport who deal directly with the travelling public;
(c) ensure that, upon recruitment, all new employees attend disability related training and that personnel receive refresher training courses when appropriate.
Article 12 provides for Compensation for lost or damaged wheelchairs, other mobility equipment and assistive devices whilst being handled at the airport or transported on board aircraft, in accordance with rules of international, Community and national law.
The regulations of the EU provides for filing complaints, appeals, redresses compensations for breach of regulations etc.
Access to Air Travel for Disabled People – Code of Practice ; united kingdom is the ratifying code which ratifies the EU Regulations. It emphasizes that the costs of providing assistance to disabled passengers at airports should not be passed directly to those disabled passengers and that it is cost effective to ensure that access for disabled people is included from the outset as part of the initial design of an aircraft and airport terminal and this directly benefits all customers. for its full text visit www.dft.gov.uk
Saturday, July 21, 2007
Consumer responsibility in civil aviation - part 1
Rajeev Rajan, Meenakshi and Smith are my motivation for writing this blog. They are the coordinators of the Disability Legislation Unit, South and they themselves are persons with disability (reduced mobility). This unit is a joint project of Vidya Sagar (Formerly Spastics Society of India, Chennai) and National Centre for the Promotion of Employment of Disabled People (NCPEDP), which works towards ensuring the implementation of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. These organizations work to raise awareness of the rights of Disabled People in the society and to lobby with the policy makers and the decision makers to frame appropriate policies. Rajeev is also one of the sub committee members of the National Trust a Statutory body formed by the National Trust Act.
These three persons travel extensively throughout the country and even abroad, campaigning for the Rights of the Persons with Disability. Every time they travel by flight they come back with a story of violation and discrimination faced by them from the airliners. The discrimination does normally revolve around accessibility into the aircraft and in the aircraft. The incident on 18th June, 2007 with the air Sahara, now jet light, is totally different than all other previous experiences. Rajeev was totally denied of his right to travel in the aircraft without an escort.
Rajeev is a Person with Cerebral Palsy, a nervous condition affecting the locomotory functions and hence he uses wheel Chair for his mobility. He was invited by the National Trust for a meeting scheduled on 18.06.07, at Delhi to discuss and plan Training on Disability and Equity for the Local Level Committee members. For this he had booked tickets to fly by Air Sahara on 18th June 2007, which was scheduled to take off at 6.35 A.M.
At the time of check in one of the Air Sahara employees came to him and asked him if he had an escort. Rajeev told him that he was a frequent traveller and used to travel alone all time, The Air Sahara Employee did not listen to what was said and took him to the Air Sahara cabin, made him to wait outside the cabin and asked him for his fit to fly certificate. Then they asked for the boarding passes of his previous travel. They also wanted him to give his residence number. Finally, they told him that he can’t travel and tried to push him with the wheel chair. When he told them firmly that he needed to fly. They called the police to send him out of the Air Port. A couple policemen knew him, as he is a frequent flyer. The policemen explained to the Air Sahara personnel, but the flight took off without him. After a long verbal war, The Air Sahara Personnel spoke to the Director of Vidya Sagar and after this offered to fly him by different Air Lines. The Air Sahara at last tried to arrange for the travel through the Spice jet, which is which is another air travel service provider undertaken by Air Shara. Even Spice Jet refused to accommodate him because of his disability.
Due to all these unbearable incidents Rajeev was unable to travel. This patently against the Right to move thought the Indian Territory [Art.(19)(1)(d)] and Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of Law within the territory of India[Art.(14)]Subsequent to the above incident the Disability Activists highlighted these violation Rights through the media. Following the uproar Hindustan Times and the Indian Express and several other local newspapers reported on 21.06.07 that the Jet light apologises for the incident. However, on 22.06.07 it was reported in the Hindustan times, that the air Sahara withdrew the apology.
On 19.01.04 when Rajeev travelled in air Sahara Kolkatta. At that time he was forced to take a tablet by a lady accompanied by the Airhostess. The lady did not even identify herself. Neither of them told the name of the tablet. A Complaint was filed in this regard before the Special Commissioner Disabilities, Chennai which was later forwarded to the Chief Commissioner and it is still pending. We are also able to find out that there are atleast three cases pending against the Air Sahara/ Jet Airways in Case Nos. 3111/05, 3196/06 and 3299/2006 before the Chief Commissioner.
The Chief Commissioner has taken up the recent incident of denial of right to travel Suo motto and has issued summons to the Air Sahara. In this notice the Chief Commissioner office has clearly stated that the persons with Cerebral palsy do not require an escort to travel and that the Cerebral Palsy is not a medical condition.
A Representations was sent by the disability legislation unit of Vidya Sagar to Air Sahara by fax on 23.06.2007 and a reply has been sent by the acting Chief Executive of the Jet light claiming that they acted in the terms of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Medical Manual and that they have followed all mandatory guide lines set out in the Manual. They also say that Rajeev has not followed the procedure prescribed in Clause 6.3.2. of the manual that requires a MEDIF form. This requires us to go into and study the IATA Medical manual.
The Manual begins with a disclaimer notice. This disclaimer states that:
“The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice.”
This clearly goes to say that the Manual is only aid to a airline operator and do not specify any guidelines as such. Airline operator has to follow the local laws of the specific country and take expert opinion in each and every case of doubt.
As far as the requirement of the MEDIF IS CONCERNED the manual says as follows.
“6.3.2 MEDIF and FREMEC
If a passenger requires special handling arrangements, Part 1 of the medical information form (MEDIF) is used. If a passenger also requires medical attention, Part 2 is filled in by the attending physician. See Appendix ‘E’.
In Part 2 all medical information shown is strictly confidential. Whenever medical clearance is necessary, this form must be filled in. If no medical clearance is required and only special handling assistance is necessary, only Part 1 of the MEDIF is completed”.
This is very much clear in its plain language that the MEDIF is required only for a person who requires special handling. In the case of Rajeev he does not require special handling and for this reason he does not require MEDIF. Moreover the Air Sahara admits Clause 6.1.2 of the Manual, in para 2 of their reply letter. This clause illustrates kinds of persons requiring medical clearance. This again shows that Rajeev is not a person who requires medical clearance.
The Air Sahara has not showed a single rule or regulation that requires a person with Cerebral Palsy or any other disability of like nature cannot travel without an escort. These facts establishes that the Air Sahara is not ready and willing to provide the service as required by them even under several other provisions of the manual. In the first instance they do not have a medical practitioner team with them as required under the manual if no it would have been sufficient for them to take an expert advice from the medical team in respect of the safety concerns and responsibilities to accommodate a person with Cerebral Palsy. And the medical team would have explained them what Cerebral palsy is all about. It is for this reason that the service of the Air Sahara is against the provisions of the manual, which is projected by them as their sacrosanct document.
AIR DECCAN is no less than Air Sahara. Smitha and Meenakshi flew in Air Deccan flight No. DN 617 from Chennai to Kolkatta on 08.09.2006 to attend the 7th National Women’s Movement Conference held during September, 2006. Smitha has a condition called as Demilination (multiple sclerosis) and Meenakshi has low mobility due to post polio paralyses. Neither of them require mobility assistance in normal circumstances. The floor of the airport had a glazy surface and was too slippery for any one. This made them avail the wheel chair service at a cost of Rs. 200/- for each of them.
For having availed the wheel Chair service they were asked by the Air Deccan officials to sign an undertaking, which read as follows.
“ I the under signed hereby indemnify and hold harmless Air Deccan from and against any liability arising out of any bodily injury and/ or death, damage or loss that may suffer/ experience and also from any damages, payments, expenses, faced or cost which Air Deccan may incur as a result of accepting me on its flight…”
this will continue shortly with
Regulation (Ec) No 1107/2006 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 5 July 2006, Concerning the Rights of Disabled Persons and Persons with Reduced Mobility when traveling by air
and
Access to Air Travel for Disabled People – Code of Practice ; united kingdom
….. visit www.dft.gov.uk
These three persons travel extensively throughout the country and even abroad, campaigning for the Rights of the Persons with Disability. Every time they travel by flight they come back with a story of violation and discrimination faced by them from the airliners. The discrimination does normally revolve around accessibility into the aircraft and in the aircraft. The incident on 18th June, 2007 with the air Sahara, now jet light, is totally different than all other previous experiences. Rajeev was totally denied of his right to travel in the aircraft without an escort.
Rajeev is a Person with Cerebral Palsy, a nervous condition affecting the locomotory functions and hence he uses wheel Chair for his mobility. He was invited by the National Trust for a meeting scheduled on 18.06.07, at Delhi to discuss and plan Training on Disability and Equity for the Local Level Committee members. For this he had booked tickets to fly by Air Sahara on 18th June 2007, which was scheduled to take off at 6.35 A.M.
At the time of check in one of the Air Sahara employees came to him and asked him if he had an escort. Rajeev told him that he was a frequent traveller and used to travel alone all time, The Air Sahara Employee did not listen to what was said and took him to the Air Sahara cabin, made him to wait outside the cabin and asked him for his fit to fly certificate. Then they asked for the boarding passes of his previous travel. They also wanted him to give his residence number. Finally, they told him that he can’t travel and tried to push him with the wheel chair. When he told them firmly that he needed to fly. They called the police to send him out of the Air Port. A couple policemen knew him, as he is a frequent flyer. The policemen explained to the Air Sahara personnel, but the flight took off without him. After a long verbal war, The Air Sahara Personnel spoke to the Director of Vidya Sagar and after this offered to fly him by different Air Lines. The Air Sahara at last tried to arrange for the travel through the Spice jet, which is which is another air travel service provider undertaken by Air Shara. Even Spice Jet refused to accommodate him because of his disability.
Due to all these unbearable incidents Rajeev was unable to travel. This patently against the Right to move thought the Indian Territory [Art.(19)(1)(d)] and Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of Law within the territory of India[Art.(14)]Subsequent to the above incident the Disability Activists highlighted these violation Rights through the media. Following the uproar Hindustan Times and the Indian Express and several other local newspapers reported on 21.06.07 that the Jet light apologises for the incident. However, on 22.06.07 it was reported in the Hindustan times, that the air Sahara withdrew the apology.
On 19.01.04 when Rajeev travelled in air Sahara Kolkatta. At that time he was forced to take a tablet by a lady accompanied by the Airhostess. The lady did not even identify herself. Neither of them told the name of the tablet. A Complaint was filed in this regard before the Special Commissioner Disabilities, Chennai which was later forwarded to the Chief Commissioner and it is still pending. We are also able to find out that there are atleast three cases pending against the Air Sahara/ Jet Airways in Case Nos. 3111/05, 3196/06 and 3299/2006 before the Chief Commissioner.
The Chief Commissioner has taken up the recent incident of denial of right to travel Suo motto and has issued summons to the Air Sahara. In this notice the Chief Commissioner office has clearly stated that the persons with Cerebral palsy do not require an escort to travel and that the Cerebral Palsy is not a medical condition.
A Representations was sent by the disability legislation unit of Vidya Sagar to Air Sahara by fax on 23.06.2007 and a reply has been sent by the acting Chief Executive of the Jet light claiming that they acted in the terms of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Medical Manual and that they have followed all mandatory guide lines set out in the Manual. They also say that Rajeev has not followed the procedure prescribed in Clause 6.3.2. of the manual that requires a MEDIF form. This requires us to go into and study the IATA Medical manual.
The Manual begins with a disclaimer notice. This disclaimer states that:
“The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice.”
This clearly goes to say that the Manual is only aid to a airline operator and do not specify any guidelines as such. Airline operator has to follow the local laws of the specific country and take expert opinion in each and every case of doubt.
As far as the requirement of the MEDIF IS CONCERNED the manual says as follows.
“6.3.2 MEDIF and FREMEC
If a passenger requires special handling arrangements, Part 1 of the medical information form (MEDIF) is used. If a passenger also requires medical attention, Part 2 is filled in by the attending physician. See Appendix ‘E’.
In Part 2 all medical information shown is strictly confidential. Whenever medical clearance is necessary, this form must be filled in. If no medical clearance is required and only special handling assistance is necessary, only Part 1 of the MEDIF is completed”.
This is very much clear in its plain language that the MEDIF is required only for a person who requires special handling. In the case of Rajeev he does not require special handling and for this reason he does not require MEDIF. Moreover the Air Sahara admits Clause 6.1.2 of the Manual, in para 2 of their reply letter. This clause illustrates kinds of persons requiring medical clearance. This again shows that Rajeev is not a person who requires medical clearance.
The Air Sahara has not showed a single rule or regulation that requires a person with Cerebral Palsy or any other disability of like nature cannot travel without an escort. These facts establishes that the Air Sahara is not ready and willing to provide the service as required by them even under several other provisions of the manual. In the first instance they do not have a medical practitioner team with them as required under the manual if no it would have been sufficient for them to take an expert advice from the medical team in respect of the safety concerns and responsibilities to accommodate a person with Cerebral Palsy. And the medical team would have explained them what Cerebral palsy is all about. It is for this reason that the service of the Air Sahara is against the provisions of the manual, which is projected by them as their sacrosanct document.
AIR DECCAN is no less than Air Sahara. Smitha and Meenakshi flew in Air Deccan flight No. DN 617 from Chennai to Kolkatta on 08.09.2006 to attend the 7th National Women’s Movement Conference held during September, 2006. Smitha has a condition called as Demilination (multiple sclerosis) and Meenakshi has low mobility due to post polio paralyses. Neither of them require mobility assistance in normal circumstances. The floor of the airport had a glazy surface and was too slippery for any one. This made them avail the wheel chair service at a cost of Rs. 200/- for each of them.
For having availed the wheel Chair service they were asked by the Air Deccan officials to sign an undertaking, which read as follows.
“ I the under signed hereby indemnify and hold harmless Air Deccan from and against any liability arising out of any bodily injury and/ or death, damage or loss that may suffer/ experience and also from any damages, payments, expenses, faced or cost which Air Deccan may incur as a result of accepting me on its flight…”
this will continue shortly with
Regulation (Ec) No 1107/2006 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 5 July 2006, Concerning the Rights of Disabled Persons and Persons with Reduced Mobility when traveling by air
and
Access to Air Travel for Disabled People – Code of Practice ; united kingdom
….. visit www.dft.gov.uk
Tuesday, July 3, 2007
Rt. to Information -guide to activist in disability sector
I am very happy to share with you a guide developed by Sakshi Trust and ActionAid India on the use of RTI to get information related to the issues faced by persons with disabilities
Sakshi Trust and ActionAid India have released a Right to information guide to improve government facilities for Disabled People.
Keeping in mind the maxim "Information is Power", this handbook intends to place power in the hands of Persons with Disability. Disabled persons are handicapped not because of their disability, but because of the lack of access to information about their rights, entitlements and procedures to access the entitlements.
Thus through this instrument we wish to empower each Person with Disability their family members, government and non-government development professionals and all other stakeholders to be able to advocate for themselves.
This book intends to provide a stepwise guide on drafting an RTI application in the context of disability. However, the book has been especially designed for use by NGO's, parents of disabled children, caregivers, students or any concerned individual in the Disability. It contains a detailed background on the different benefits that a disabled person is entitled to from the government. The main topics covered are disability certification, education, employment, public access, poverty alleviation schemes, assistive devices and complaint process and as such will be useful to any one seeking general information as well.
A ready to use list of applications have been pre-formatted and drafted and one can use this to seek information from any State or central office. We put down RTI applications for your reference so that you may seek relevant information in an effort to facilitate a more transparent and accountable system of governance.
The guide contains RTI applications for:
1. Obtaining a disability certificate
2. Facilitating barrier free access in government buildings
3. Improving access to public education and employment opportunities for disabled people
4. Ensuring complaints and appeals of disabled people are expedited by the Commissioner PWD
5. Reservation for PWD in poverty alleviation schemes.
You can download it from here:
http://www.actionaidindia.org/RTI_guide_Disability_Issues.htm
Sakshi Trust and ActionAid India have released a Right to information guide to improve government facilities for Disabled People.
Keeping in mind the maxim "Information is Power", this handbook intends to place power in the hands of Persons with Disability. Disabled persons are handicapped not because of their disability, but because of the lack of access to information about their rights, entitlements and procedures to access the entitlements.
Thus through this instrument we wish to empower each Person with Disability their family members, government and non-government development professionals and all other stakeholders to be able to advocate for themselves.
This book intends to provide a stepwise guide on drafting an RTI application in the context of disability. However, the book has been especially designed for use by NGO's, parents of disabled children, caregivers, students or any concerned individual in the Disability. It contains a detailed background on the different benefits that a disabled person is entitled to from the government. The main topics covered are disability certification, education, employment, public access, poverty alleviation schemes, assistive devices and complaint process and as such will be useful to any one seeking general information as well.
A ready to use list of applications have been pre-formatted and drafted and one can use this to seek information from any State or central office. We put down RTI applications for your reference so that you may seek relevant information in an effort to facilitate a more transparent and accountable system of governance.
The guide contains RTI applications for:
1. Obtaining a disability certificate
2. Facilitating barrier free access in government buildings
3. Improving access to public education and employment opportunities for disabled people
4. Ensuring complaints and appeals of disabled people are expedited by the Commissioner PWD
5. Reservation for PWD in poverty alleviation schemes.
You can download it from here:
http://www.actionaidindia.org/RTI_guide_Disability_Issues.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)